Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Qualifying EB Welding procedure – How Pronexos delivers reliable and robust EB welded products

Welded TZM alloy pipe with macro inset
Welded TZM alloy pipe with macro inset

Pronexos is one of only a few companies that can offer EB welding in house, with the machinery and expertise to produce products for clients on both a small and large-scale production.

Any EB welding order at Pronexos will start with an extensive test phase. A new product needs to follow various stages for a Welding Procedure Qualification Record (WPQR). The weld parameters first need to be determined using simplified test pieces.

The welded test pieces are cut into cross sections, polished and etched before microscopic inspection takes place. Once the definitive weld parameters have been set in the Welding Procedure Specification (WPS), the final weld contours are programmed, for example with an offset of 1 mm in relation to the weld if required. This is followed with leak and pressure testing before the weld procedure is set down in work instructions.

Example project 1 – Welding TZM alloy

Cross section of copper and stainless steel
Cross section of copper and stainless steel

Weld tests were conducted with TZM alloy (Titanium Zirconium Molybdenum) for a nuclear application. This alloy is comprised of approx. 99% molybdenum, 0.5% titanium, 0.08% zirconium and 0.02% carbon. The tests consisted of welding together two small pipes with a wall thickness of 3.7 mm.

Characteristic properties of molybdenum are its high melting temperature (2,620 °C), very high sensitivity to oxidation and limited weldability. Molybdenum is susceptible to embrittlement. If correct measures are not taken, welding causes grain growth in the molybdenum and brittle structures in the weld and heat-affected zone. The ductile-brittle transition temperature also plays a significant role here. Materials that are ductile above this temperature become brittle when they fall below the transition temperature. This temperature is 150 – 260 °C for molybdenum, so the weld needs to take place above this temperature.

The use of heat treatments, welding with minimal heat input and working very cleanly made it possible to fabricate a good weld connection. The preheating took place with a divergent electron beam in the vacuum chamber itself. In the initial tests, in which low tension was not annealed after welding, cracks appeared after welding. Only after applying tension arm annealing in a vacuum furnace did no cracks appear in the welded product.

This image shows detail of the weld surface of the welded TZM pipe. The inset shows a macro of the weld (weld depth 3.8 mm, width at half depth 0.7 mm).

Example project 2 – Copper to stainless steel

This was another application required the joining of copper to stainless steel discs. The aim was to construct a robust weld 3 – 4 mm deep.

This was a weld that would not be subjected to strength testing. The challenge of welding copper to stainless steel is that copper is a very good heat conductor but stainless steel isn’t. The melting points of the materials are also different.

Choosing a wider weld made it possible to join these materials. This means there isn’t an even melt between the copper and the stainless steel, but rather a type of melt emulsion.

Hardness measurements were taken on the base material, in the weld and in both heat-affected zones after the welding. This showed that there were no hard phases on the weld or heat-affected zone that could lead to embrittlement.

Recent Posts

 slide image

Green light for Pronexos’s journey to space